What is a downside of the Functional Solutions Model?

The downside identified in option B highlights how the Functional Solutions Model can inadvertently place the financial responsibility on individuals with disabilities instead of promoting systemic support or accommodations. This perspective is problematic because it may lead to a situation where individuals are expected to bear the costs associated with their disability, such as assistive devices or accessibility modifications, rather than those costs being addressed by organizations, government programs, or community resources.

This shift can hinder equality and inclusivity, reinforcing societal barriers rather than dismantling them. In a more equitable model, the burden of creating accessible environments would be shared among all stakeholders, rather than falling solely on those who require accommodations. This recognition aligns with the principles of inclusive design and promotes a more just approach to disability, where the focus is on removing barriers at all levels.